OpenViolations
/

32-25 88 Street

QueensBIN 4535000
HPD registration valid
Export CSV
OverviewHealth scoreTimelineFinesOwner

32-25 88 Street at a glance

32-25 88 Street, Queens has 0 open city records on file, none of them Class C, and no balance recorded as due on OATH/ECB summonses. The most recent record is dated Dec 31, 2025.

Open Class C
0
Immediately hazardous
Open Class B
0
Hazardous
Open Class A
0
Non-hazardous
Fines due
$0.00
Balance on OATH/ECB summonses
Permits on file
7
DOB permit records
Last activity
Dec 31, 2025
Bedbugs record

Health score for 32-25 88 Street

A composite of public indicators. Every input is a public record. See the full methodology.

A
Health score · Aug 4, 2026
Scored from all 28 public records for this building
Open Class C violations
Immediately hazardous, uncertified
This building 0
Open Class B violations
Hazardous
This building 0
Heat & hot water records
Violations and complaints, last 24 months
This building 0
Unpaid penalties
OATH/ECB summonses with balance due
This building $0
Bedbug filings with infestations
Annual LL69 filings on record
This building 0
Tenant litigation
Open HP actions in Housing Court
This building 0
Active vacate order
HPD or FDNY order to vacate, still in effect
This building No

Record timeline for 32-25 88 Street

Every record from every agency, interleaved. 28 records on file.

Download this timeline (CSV) →
Dec 31, 2025
Sep 26, 2025
Jun 13, 2025
Dec 5, 2023
Sep 27, 2023
Jun 5, 2023
Mar 30, 2023
Nov 15, 2022
Mar 9, 2022
Apr 19, 2021
Feb 1, 2019
Dec 7, 2018
Mar 8, 2018
Aug 22, 2017
May 23, 2017
Apr 17, 2014
Aug 30, 2013
Jun 7, 2013
Apr 23, 2013
Mar 18, 2013
Jul 18, 2012
Sep 15, 2011
Oct 29, 2010
Oct 29, 2010
Oct 29, 2010
Sep 22, 2010
Aug 17, 2010
Jan 26, 2009

OATH / ECB summonses & fines at 32-25 88 Street

No balance is recorded as due across the 2 summonses below, out of $800.00 in penalties imposed. The city’s published records do not show whether a penalty was paid, reduced, or written off.

OATH and ECB summonses for 32-25 88 Street
267150Oct 29, 2010LICENSED RIGGER FAILED TO ENSURE SCAFFOLD WORKER MET MINIMUM REQUIREMEMay 17, 2011IN VIOLATION—
913394Oct 29, 2010RIGGER FAILED TO NAME A DESIGNATED FOREMAN NOTED:UPON INSP OBSERVED MEMay 17, 2011IN VIOLATION—