647 Sheffield Avenue

HPD litigation: Tenant Action

0 infested unit(s) reported

0 infested unit(s) reported

0 infested unit(s) reported

§ 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 HMC, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( C) MDL AND 28 RCNY §25-171: REPLACE OR REPAIR THE SELF-CLOSING DOORS THAT IS MISSING OR DEFECTIVE ... , 1st STORY

0 infested unit(s) reported

0 infested unit(s) reported

0 infested unit(s) reported

FAILURE TO CERTIFY CORRECTION ON IMMEDIATELY HAZARDOUS (CLASS 1) ECB VIOLATION

FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEUQATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENT AS NOTED AT TIME OF INSPECTION IT WAS OBSERVED THAT A LARGE AMOUNTS OF DEBRIS ON THE EXPOSURE # 1 AND 3 AND ON THE 3RD FLOOR LARGE AMOUNTS TO OF

JOB SITE FENCE NOT CONSTRUCTED OR MAINTAINED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION. NOTED: AT TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED FENCE IN PLACE THAT NOT SOLID PLYWOOD. THE PANEL IS PARTICLE BOARD W/EASILY INJURED PEOPLE IT GET INT

DOB complaint: Construction – Contrary/Beyond Approved Plans/Permits

DOB complaint: After Hours Work – Illegal

DOB complaint: CSC: Low-Rise Tracking Complaint

DOB complaint: CSC: Low-Rise Tracking Complaint

CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO PERFORM DUTIES PER CODE. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO PERFORM HIS DUTIES BY NOT HAVING A COMPETENT PERSON WHILE

FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROVED/ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AT JOBSITE AT TIME OF INSPECTION. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION THE CONTRACTORS COULD NOT PRODUCE THE DOB APPROVED SIDEWALK SHED DRAWINGS. THEY HAD IT FOR

WORK DOES NOT CONFORM TO SITE SAFETY PLAN. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CONTRACTORS HAD A SITE SAFETY PLAN WHICH SHOWED FLAGMEN,ROOF PROTECTION & A WATER TRUCK FOR POST CONTROL. NONE OF TH

SEC. 3303.2.3.1 FAILURE TO INSTALL TEMPORARY LIGHTING FOR CONSTRUCTIONSITES. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION THE CONTRACTORS FAILED TO HAVE ANY TEMPORARY LIGHTING ON ALL FLOORS OF AN ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION SITE.

SEC. 3309.1 FAILURE TO PROTECT OR ADEQUATELY PROTECT ADJOINING PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLITION OPERATION. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CONTRACTORS FAILED TO INSTALL ANY ROOF

FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 33. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION,THE CONTRACTORS COULD NOT PRODUCE ANY OF THESPECIAL INSPECTION REPORTS FOR THE ITEMS REQUIRING A SPECIAL INSPECTIO

FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS. ATTHE TIME OF INSPECTION IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CONTRACTORS HAD AN EXCESSIVE AMOUNT OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AT EXP#1&3 CREATING A HAZADOUS

FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMNETS.AS NOTED AT TIME OF MY INSPECTION ON A ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION SITE I OBSERVED POOR HOUSEKEEPING AT EXPOSURE #1 CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS STORED ON THE

DOB complaint: Sustainability Enforcement Work Order

C-CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPTIONAL

FENCE AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED FENCE NOT CONSTRUCTED PER CODE. AT EXP#4 ACCESS TO SITE FROM BLDG #651 SHEFFIELD AVE STAIRS CREATES A CONDITION OF UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY TO CONSTRUCTION SITE BY PUBLIC. IN ADDI

FAILURE TO PROVIDE SIDEWALK SHED WHERE REQUIRED. AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF N/B WORK CURRENTLY UP TO THE 2ND FL LEVEL,AT EXP#4 OBSERVED NO PROTECTION,TO ADJACENT BLDG LOCATED AT 651 SHEFFIELD AVE CREATING HAZARDO

DOB complaint: Adjacent Buildings – Not Protected

C-CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPTIONAL

C-CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPTIONAL