440 East 62 Street

0 infested unit(s) reported

HPD litigation: Tenant Action/Harrassment

HPD litigation: Tenant Action/Harrassment

FTM BUILDING IN A CODE COMPLIANT MANNER. EXHAUST DISCHARGE MUST BE NO CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM BUILDING OPENINGS PER MC 501.2, MC 401.5.2. NOTED (6) COMMERCIAL GRADE DRYERS LOCATED IN CELLAR ARE DISCHARGING EXH

DOB complaint: Vent/Exhaust – Illegal/Improper

0 infested unit(s) reported

0 infested unit(s) reported

DOB complaint cat. 2Y

VIOLATION ISSUED-FAILURE TO FILE 2021 EXTERNAL LOW PRESSURE INSPECTION

VIOLATION ISSUED-FAILURE TO FILE 2021 EXTERNAL LOW PRESSURE INSPECTION

DOB complaint: CSE: Tracking Compliance

0 infested unit(s) reported

FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN ACCEPTABLE REQUIRED CYCLE 9A REPORT OF CRITICAL EXAMINATION DOCUMENTING CONDITION OF EXTERIOR WALL AND APPURTENANCES REQUIRED BY 28-302.4 FOR CONTROL#905304.REMEDY:SUBMIT ACCEPTABLE REQUIRE

DOB complaint: Construction Safety Compliance (CSC) Action

AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED SUSPENDED SCAFFOLDING USING C-HOOKS AT EXP.4. WHEN ASKING THE SSM FOR THE C-HOOK DESIGN DRAWINGS - NONE COULD BE PROVIDED. STOP ALL USE OF SUSPENDED SCAFFOLDING AT EXP.4..PROVIDE

AT TIME OF INSPECTION ON AN ACTIVE 19 STORY ALT JOBSITE I OBSERVED 6 WORKERS PERFORMING FACADE WORK AT EXP.2 ON TOP OF SIDEWALK SHED- WHILE PERFORMING INSPECTION I OBSERVED NO FIRE EXTINGUISHERS ON SITE. THIS I

AT TIME OF INSPECTION ON AN ACTIVE 19 STORY ALT JOBSITE I OBSERVED 6 WORKERS PERFORMING FACADE WORK USING SUPPORTED SCAFFOLDING AT EXP.2 ON TOP OF THE SIDEWALK SHED. I OBSERVED EGRESS BEING BLOCKED BY DEBRIS AN

AT TIME OF INSPECTION ON AN ACTIVE 19 STORY ALT - FACADE JOB SITE I OBSERVED 6 WORKERS ON SITE PERFORMING FACADE WORK AT EXP.2. WHEN ASKING THE QSP ON SITE FOR THE FOLLOWING ON SITE DOCUMENTS I OBSERVED THEM NO

AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED IN USE SUPPORTED SCAFFOLDING INSTALLED AT EXP. 1 AND 2. OBSERVED SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD NOT MAINTAINED TO CODE, DUE TO THE FOLLOWING OBSERVED CONDITIONS: 1.)NOT FULLY PLANKED 2.)PLANK

AT TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED SUSPENDED SCAFFOLDING INSTALLED AT EXP.4 USING C- HOOKS, I OBSERVED LIFELINES AND TIEBACKS ANCHORED WITH INADEQUATE PROTECTION USING T-SHIRTS AND NOT FULLY PROTECTED..PROVIDE AD

DOB complaint: Construction Safety Compliance (CSC) Action

0 infested unit(s) reported

FAILURE TO DISPLAY ENERGY EFFICIENCY SCORE AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY GRADE AS PER ADCODE SEC. 28-309.12.3

DOB complaint: Construction Safety Compliance (CSC) Action

SEC. 28-110.1(1-20) SITE SAFETY PLAN INADEQUATE TO SITE OBSERVATION. AT TIME OF INSPECTION,UPON REVIEW OF THE SITE SAFETY PLAN,NO ILLUSTRATED DETAILS OF THE SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD IN PLACE @ EXP#1&2 OR THE STAGING

DOB complaint: Construction Safety Compliance (CSC) Action

WORK DOES NOT CONFORM TO APPROVE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS &/OR AMENDMENTS. AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED A SUPPORTED PIPE SCAFFOLD IN PLACE ATOP OF A SIDEWALK SHED @ EXP#1 & STAIR TOWER AT CORNER OF EXP#1&2. UPO

FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY REQUIRED ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED ONSITEDOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 33. AT TIME OF INSPECTION,UPON REQUEST OF THE SITE-PRESHIFT MEETINGS,SITE SAFETY ORIENTATION LOG,DAILY SITE

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS. AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED A SIDEWALK SHED IN PLACE @ EXP#1&2 W/ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION WORK. AT THE CORNER OF EXP#1&2 WAS A PIPE SCAFFOLD STAIR TOWER

SEC. 1RCNY 3310-01 PERMIT HOLDER FAILURE TO DESIGNATED QUALIFIED PERSON(QSP). AT TIME OF INSPECTION,UPON REQUEST OF THE QUALIFIED SAFETY PERSON,GINIPAL SINGH WAS PRESENT & STATED OR ACKNOWLEDGE HE WAS THE QSP @